Who is my brother's keeper?

نویسنده

  • M H Kottow
چکیده

Clinical and research practices designed by developed countries are often implemented in host nations of the Third World. In recent years, a number of papers have presented a diversity of arguments to justify these practices which include the defence of research with placebos even though best proven treatments exist; the distribution of drugs unapproved in their country of origin; withholding of existing therapy in order to observe the natural course of infection and disease; redefinition of equipoise to a more bland version, and denial of post-trial benefits to research subjects. These practices have all been prohibited in developed, sponsoring countries, even though they invariably have pockets of poverty where conditions comparable to the Third World prevail. Furthermore, the latest update of the Declaration of Helsinki clearly decries double ethical standards in research protocols. Under these circumstances, it does not seem appropriate that First World scholars should propose and defend research and clinical practices with less stringent ethical standards than those mandatory in their own countries. Recent years have witnessed frequent reports of less stringent ethical standards being applied to both clinical and research medical practices, for the most part in the field of drug trials and drug marketing, initiated by developed countries in poorer nations. Still more unsettling, a number of articles have endorsed the policy of employing ethical norms in these host countries, which would be unacceptable to both the legislations and the moral standards of the sponsor nations. Also, these reformulations often contravene the Declaration of Helsinki or one of its updates. This paper is not so much concerned with the actual practices, which have been subjected to frequent scrutiny and publicly decried when gross misconduct occurred. Rather, my concern relates to the approval and support such practices have found in the literature on bioethics from authors who might be expected to use their energy and scholarship to explore and endorse the universalisability of ethics rather than to develop ad hoc arguments that would allow exceptions and variations from accepted moral standards. To this purpose, issue will be taken with arguments in three fields: medical and pharmaceutical practices, research strategies, and local application of research results.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Am I my brother's keeper?

Introduction: 1. This sermon logically and chronologically follows a sermon entitled, " Blood Is Thicker than Blood. " 2. That sermon exalts the precious bonds saints have in the family of God and in their own local churches. 3. This sermon identifies the great blessing and duties of fulfilling our roles in our local congregations. 4. Attending church to sing, hear a sermon, and then go home is...

متن کامل

The Responsibility of the Management for the Effect of Focal Infection (Especially Dental) on the Life, Health, and Efficiency of the Employee

.A new truth is a new sense, for with it an individual can see things which he could not see before receiving that new truth and which others cannot see who have not learned that new truth. But new truths come only to prepared minds. The purpose of this association, in its ultimate analysis, is to correlate and present new truths, which, when they become new senses, will conserve human life. Yo...

متن کامل

'The story of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" or "am I my brother's keeper?".

Presented is a case report of a violent sexual assault where the DNA profile obtained from an item of evidence was compared to a suspect's profile. The profiles did not match, but the sharing of such a large number of alleles raised the suspicion that perhaps the real perpetrator was a blood relative of the suspect. The investigators requested a sample from the suspect's brother, and a match wa...

متن کامل

My Brother's Keeper? Compassion Predicts Generosity More Among Less Religious Individuals

Past research argues that religious commitments shape individuals’ prosocial sentiments, including their generosity and solidarity. But what drives the prosociality of less religious people? Three studies tested the hypothesis that, with fewer religious expectations of prosociality, less religious individuals’ levels of compassion will play a larger role in their prosocial tendencies. In Study ...

متن کامل

brother's keeper

Families cannot be exchanged or denied. There is a sad futility about wishing our families were otherwise. So it is with the community of general practitioners to which we all belong. We share the same title, and will be judged collectively whether we like it or not. We may not want to account for some of our colleagues. We may try to surround ourselves with like-minded doctors and pretend that...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of medical ethics

دوره 28 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002